Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Gavin Mounsey's avatar

I see this “notes “ feature on substack as a slippery slope. I see it as them trying to turn nourishing essays, referenced articles and in depth self expression into fast food for the mind.

Making substack more like facebook, Instagram or twitter will likely mean we see an increase in all that comes with all those types of platforms, such as selfy-narcissism, government bots "sock puppets" posing as humans, superficial discussions and a long list of mental issues that arise from the “i need more likes syndrome” that such platforms were designed to elicit.

I think “notes” will serve to feed into the proclivity of most people to embrace a severely impaired attention span due to widespread addictions to social media frameworks that have limited character counts.

This, for the most part, keeps posts superficial and not able to comprehensively inform or educate the reader, leading to endless re-posting of meaningless screenshots of other people’s posts… echoing around.

I see this trend to make everything ‘facebook-esk’ and ‘twitified’ as pathway that will likely lead to mental atrophy for many and an entire generation of children that find it hard to sit down and read a book because it contains more than 280 characters.

I will not be using “notes” on my end. Thanks for posting this and sharing your thoughts on "notes".

Expand full comment
Eris's avatar

No notes for me, I will not fall in this trap, as I gave up many years ago on fb, instagram etc. I prefere the blog type for many reasons.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts