Haven't yet looked at the rest of this post. Just clicked "like" while listening to "Always Look On The Bright Side of Life" - Life Of Brian (Monty Python), again and again. It's not yet replacing "In The (bloody) Navy" by the Village People. Seriously, it's in my skull--In The Navy--over and over and over...and it won't leave me alone. My god, now it's like a salad of nostalgia from hell, or perhaps purgatory, but so catchy.
A little past halfway (1:15-20) into the interview by Richard Grove and he’s categorizing or characterizing 9/11 as a “terrorist attack,” asking about whether the CIA had knowledge of the attack/the terrorists, but then let the conversation drift off to “cast iron” targets. So then I’m thinking, “something about this conversation is not right, or perhaps it’s just Grove; gatekeeping professionalism’s to an extreme; very good crooked “actor(s)” perhaps. But then 1:30 in, their back talking about “physical nature” of the attack; molten steel; three buildings collapsing in their own footprint. I believe Bill, NSA whistleblower, but still, Richard is aggravating me like a 2x4 sized splinter in my head competing with the other “In The Navy” splinter still in my head. Grove is very convincing, much more than Alex Jones, but perhaps after 22 years of investigating this shit I may be just too triggered to believe gatekeepers are “shaping narratives;” a false-positive of suspicion(s). Something else interesting though, that Bill mentions “gray phones” and Grove doesn’t flinch or follow up, like he’s already familiar. This is the first time I’ve ever heard that term in public. In any case, this is definitely an incredible interview with tons of information, most I’m familiar, but for my educated readers and most others this video will blow them away, if they are actually “hearing” it without interruption and a clear mind. Very, very disturbing. 🙏 Love your work/Substack! Sincerely👉🏽☕️ ☕️
May I suggest that when dealing with topics like 9/11 one allows people to be who they are. My understanding of Binney is that he is a committed, conservative, republican, US patriot. He was dedicated to the task of protecting the US through constitutionally legal methods which were cost effective, preserved the competencies of his colleagues and kept the politically influenced ideologues from taking control of the NSA. I liken him, at the NSA, to McGovern, at the CIA, in this regard.
His view of 9/11 will have been coloured, in 2015, by his experience at NSA and the internal dialogue. There was a lot of 'chatter' from the station in Yemen which they had tapped and from which much of the airline pilot side of the operation by al Qaeda related persons were do their things. This applies of others. I think Coleen Rawley might be one. They believe the plane part of the story because there was actionable intelligence which indicated this was happening, because it was, and this was not acted on. What they don't know is that the planes had nothing to do with the building destructions in New York City. So, they are trapped in a poor assessment, partly through false guilt.
For sure. And I agree, totally. Individuals like McGovern do read credible. That is, I believe they believe what they believe, but take into consideration that they have also been “compartmentalized” their entire career, even after they retired. However, there are analysts who understood these methods of controlling data and narratives early on and have managed to remain independent critical thinkers due to their unique nature and special talents for discovery—even after rather intense “schooling.” So I’m doing my best to remain subjective, but overly cautious not to get sucked into the unreal.
No doubt, “false guilt” is real and likely for many who’ve been trying to “do the right thing.” Also very real are the professional gaslighters, and there are many types for various “sweep & clean” ops. I’ve been aware of government keeping isolated assets or “control groups” within multiple offices of additional controls (a Pandora’s box from Hell) even prior to active duty, and that these process extend well beyond the “corporation” (CIA, NSA, FBI, DOD) to their private companies and civilian assets in the field.
There are tens of thousand of individuals within many government offices and the private sector who’ve spotted and reported suspicious “happenings” going back over a year leading up to 9/11 (as well as the Plandemic and the 10/7 Israeli “attack”), but particularly after the Bush family took over security for building one, two and seven. But anytime credible intelligence was reported to department chiefs or commanders, they were dismissed and redirected into their cul-de-sac of nowhere (sometimes to places like Antarctica) or professionally gaslit so not to develop credible “actionable intelligence” into the record/daily logs, which would then have to be disappeared along with the reporter. These same identical processes have been happening with the COVID plandemic and the 10/07 Israeli attack. Such as, reports of biosynthetic nano-bots, myocarditis, turbo cancer or fibrous blood clots after the Vaxx rolled out, or boarder activity reported by female Israeli soldiers that immediately led to these individuals being discredited and gaslit. Many have been disappeared along with their reports. Some have committed suicide (murdered). Evidence is still being destroyed to this day, just like 9/11. “They” are literally destroying entire databases rather than having to go through the trouble of tedious redactions, just like 9/11. I’ve been saying that allot lately; just like 9/11.
I’m typically very short and impatient, particularly at this stage of “their” push for trans-humanism, depopulation; WWIII. After repeatedly discovering so many “actors in the crowd” or perhaps clueless, “schooled tools” intentionally or unintentionally misdirecting their target audience, I’m still pretty good about not prejudging journalists, government officials, agents and assets so not to leave out important information for the archive; to “allow people to be who they are,” as you say.
But there comes a point for historic accuracy we must be capable of removing ourselves from the subterfuge, remain conscious-centered enough to identify real “gatekeepers” redirecting the public’s attention away from the “real” (that this “protocol of deception” created by the Oligarchy and their government lieutenants must be considered an ongoing reality).
Since the evolution of AI, distinguishing between individuals who are intelligently awake (not WOKE) and telling the “whole of truths” as they are and not as they are emotionally driven to believe vs. the perpetual clueless tools vs. those who are real intelligent actors fully aware of the deception they’re peddling—even if compartmentalization has limited their ability to take a step back to comprehend the whole of reality—is becoming increasingly difficult.
Haven't yet looked at the rest of this post. Just clicked "like" while listening to "Always Look On The Bright Side of Life" - Life Of Brian (Monty Python), again and again. It's not yet replacing "In The (bloody) Navy" by the Village People. Seriously, it's in my skull--In The Navy--over and over and over...and it won't leave me alone. My god, now it's like a salad of nostalgia from hell, or perhaps purgatory, but so catchy.
A little past halfway (1:15-20) into the interview by Richard Grove and he’s categorizing or characterizing 9/11 as a “terrorist attack,” asking about whether the CIA had knowledge of the attack/the terrorists, but then let the conversation drift off to “cast iron” targets. So then I’m thinking, “something about this conversation is not right, or perhaps it’s just Grove; gatekeeping professionalism’s to an extreme; very good crooked “actor(s)” perhaps. But then 1:30 in, their back talking about “physical nature” of the attack; molten steel; three buildings collapsing in their own footprint. I believe Bill, NSA whistleblower, but still, Richard is aggravating me like a 2x4 sized splinter in my head competing with the other “In The Navy” splinter still in my head. Grove is very convincing, much more than Alex Jones, but perhaps after 22 years of investigating this shit I may be just too triggered to believe gatekeepers are “shaping narratives;” a false-positive of suspicion(s). Something else interesting though, that Bill mentions “gray phones” and Grove doesn’t flinch or follow up, like he’s already familiar. This is the first time I’ve ever heard that term in public. In any case, this is definitely an incredible interview with tons of information, most I’m familiar, but for my educated readers and most others this video will blow them away, if they are actually “hearing” it without interruption and a clear mind. Very, very disturbing. 🙏 Love your work/Substack! Sincerely👉🏽☕️ ☕️
May I suggest that when dealing with topics like 9/11 one allows people to be who they are. My understanding of Binney is that he is a committed, conservative, republican, US patriot. He was dedicated to the task of protecting the US through constitutionally legal methods which were cost effective, preserved the competencies of his colleagues and kept the politically influenced ideologues from taking control of the NSA. I liken him, at the NSA, to McGovern, at the CIA, in this regard.
His view of 9/11 will have been coloured, in 2015, by his experience at NSA and the internal dialogue. There was a lot of 'chatter' from the station in Yemen which they had tapped and from which much of the airline pilot side of the operation by al Qaeda related persons were do their things. This applies of others. I think Coleen Rawley might be one. They believe the plane part of the story because there was actionable intelligence which indicated this was happening, because it was, and this was not acted on. What they don't know is that the planes had nothing to do with the building destructions in New York City. So, they are trapped in a poor assessment, partly through false guilt.
For sure. And I agree, totally. Individuals like McGovern do read credible. That is, I believe they believe what they believe, but take into consideration that they have also been “compartmentalized” their entire career, even after they retired. However, there are analysts who understood these methods of controlling data and narratives early on and have managed to remain independent critical thinkers due to their unique nature and special talents for discovery—even after rather intense “schooling.” So I’m doing my best to remain subjective, but overly cautious not to get sucked into the unreal.
No doubt, “false guilt” is real and likely for many who’ve been trying to “do the right thing.” Also very real are the professional gaslighters, and there are many types for various “sweep & clean” ops. I’ve been aware of government keeping isolated assets or “control groups” within multiple offices of additional controls (a Pandora’s box from Hell) even prior to active duty, and that these process extend well beyond the “corporation” (CIA, NSA, FBI, DOD) to their private companies and civilian assets in the field.
There are tens of thousand of individuals within many government offices and the private sector who’ve spotted and reported suspicious “happenings” going back over a year leading up to 9/11 (as well as the Plandemic and the 10/7 Israeli “attack”), but particularly after the Bush family took over security for building one, two and seven. But anytime credible intelligence was reported to department chiefs or commanders, they were dismissed and redirected into their cul-de-sac of nowhere (sometimes to places like Antarctica) or professionally gaslit so not to develop credible “actionable intelligence” into the record/daily logs, which would then have to be disappeared along with the reporter. These same identical processes have been happening with the COVID plandemic and the 10/07 Israeli attack. Such as, reports of biosynthetic nano-bots, myocarditis, turbo cancer or fibrous blood clots after the Vaxx rolled out, or boarder activity reported by female Israeli soldiers that immediately led to these individuals being discredited and gaslit. Many have been disappeared along with their reports. Some have committed suicide (murdered). Evidence is still being destroyed to this day, just like 9/11. “They” are literally destroying entire databases rather than having to go through the trouble of tedious redactions, just like 9/11. I’ve been saying that allot lately; just like 9/11.
I’m typically very short and impatient, particularly at this stage of “their” push for trans-humanism, depopulation; WWIII. After repeatedly discovering so many “actors in the crowd” or perhaps clueless, “schooled tools” intentionally or unintentionally misdirecting their target audience, I’m still pretty good about not prejudging journalists, government officials, agents and assets so not to leave out important information for the archive; to “allow people to be who they are,” as you say.
But there comes a point for historic accuracy we must be capable of removing ourselves from the subterfuge, remain conscious-centered enough to identify real “gatekeepers” redirecting the public’s attention away from the “real” (that this “protocol of deception” created by the Oligarchy and their government lieutenants must be considered an ongoing reality).
Since the evolution of AI, distinguishing between individuals who are intelligently awake (not WOKE) and telling the “whole of truths” as they are and not as they are emotionally driven to believe vs. the perpetual clueless tools vs. those who are real intelligent actors fully aware of the deception they’re peddling—even if compartmentalization has limited their ability to take a step back to comprehend the whole of reality—is becoming increasingly difficult.